LDR   03741nam^^22002893a^4500
001        FI15060953_00001
005        20171020100522.0
006        m^^^^^o^^d^^^^^^^^
007        cr^^n^---ma^mp
008        150618n^^^^^^^^xx^||||^o^^^^^|||^u^eng^d
245 00 |a Planning for Sea Level Rise before and after a Coastal Disaster |h [electronic resource].
260        |c 1984.
490        |a Planning Before and After a Coastal Disaster.
506        |a Please contact the owning institution for licensing and permissions. It is the user's responsibility to ensure use does not violate any third party rights.
520 2    |a Ocean beach resorts in the United States have always faced erosion and storm damage. At first, these risks were accepted as inevitable. Development was generally sparse, and people often built relatively inexpensive cottages along the ocean that they could afford to lose. When the occasional severe storm destroyed these houses and eroded the beach, replacement structures were frequently built farther inland to maintain the original distance from the shore.1 After World War II, beaches became more popular and were developed more densely than before. The resulting increases in real estate values enabled greater numbers of communities to justify expensive engineering solutions to maintain their shorelines. Frequently subsidized by the federal government, the practice of stabilizing shorelines replaced the previous custom of accepting erosion as inevitable. The projected rise in sea level poses a fundamental question: how long should these communities hold back the sea? In the decades ahead, the costs of shoreline protection will rise dramatically and the relative efficiencies of various measures will change. But without such efforts, a 1 ft rise would erode most shorelines over 100 ft, threatening recreational use of both beaches and adjacent houses. Even under the low scenario, this could happen by 2025. Although sea level is not expected to rise rapidly until after 2000, resort communities may have to consider its consequences much sooner. After the next major storm, in particular, homeowners whose properties are destroyed will decide whether and how to rebuild; and local governments will decide whether or not to let all of them rebuild, and which options are appropriate to address the storm-induced erosion. How well a community ultimately adapts to sea level rise will depend largely on the direction it takes when it reaches this crossroads. This chapter examines the impact of sea level rise on the decisions that must be made before and after a coastal disaster. We first sketch the impact of sea level rise on coastal resorts, as well as the implications of recent federal policy changes. Using Sullivans Island, South Carolina (part of the Charleston study area) as an example, we discuss the impact of sea level rise on property owners' decisions on whether to rebuild if a storm happens to destroy their oceanfront houses in 1990. We then discuss the community's interest in this individual decision, as well as other decisions facing local governments. We conclude by discussing several policy changes that would enable coastal communities to better prepare for a rising sea.
533        |a Electronic reproduction. |c Florida International University, |d 2015. |f (dpSobek) |n Mode of access: World Wide Web. |n System requirements: Internet connectivity; Web browser software.
650        |a Climate change.
650        |a Sea level rise.
650        |a Coastal management.
650        |a Natural disaster.
720 1    |a Titus, James G..
830    0 |a dpSobek.
830    0 |a Sea Level Rise.
852        |a dpSobek |c Sea Level Rise
856 40 |u http://dpanther.fiu.edu/dpService/dpPurlService/purl/FI15060953/00001 |y Click here for full text
992 04 |a http://dpanther.fiu.edu/sobek/content/FI/15/06/09/53/00001/Titus_1984_Planning for sea level rise before and after a coastal disasterthm.jpg
997        |a Sea Level Rise


The record above was auto-generated from the METS file.